The latest update included:
New Studies! All reported studies up to 30 August 2020 have now been included for the 6 original drug classes (DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1RAs, SGLT2 inhibitors, TZDs, SUs and the biguanide metformin), new experimental drugs (see below), along with numerous studies with basal insulins (e.g. insulin glargine, basaglar, toujeo, insulin degludec, insulin detemir, NPH insulin). Currently there are:
Total Studies: 307
Total Treatment Arms: 958
Total Patients: >170 000
New Cardiovascular Outcome Trials Section! New results, based on a comparison of 16 CV outcome trials, are now available here. Across these trials, a total of over 157 000 patients experienced more than 16 900 events. What can we learn from this vast amount of data, and how can we use that information to better design the next CV outcome trial?
New Clinical Trial Simulator! It is now possible to evaluate and optimise new trials using our Clinical Trial Simulator (available here). What two drug regimens would you like to see go head-to-head?
New Experimental Drugs! Using the latest clinical studies results, exciting new drugs currently in clinical development have been incorporated into the mathematical models. These include:
GLP-1 receptor agonists: Oral semaglutide (Novo), efpeglenatide/HM11260C (Sanofi/Hanmi) and ITCA 650 (Intarcia)
Dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists: tirzepatide/LY3298176 (Lilly) and NNC0090-2746 (Novo)
Dual GLP-1/GCG receptor agonist: MEDI0382 (MedImmune)
New Initial Combination Studies! The mathematic models have been successfully extended to both describe and predict initial combination therapies (71 new combination arms across 44 studies) using the individual monotherapy components (with some mechanistic insights incorporated). That is, the models can describe both the observed combinations, but can also be used to predict novel combinations. We hope to extend the website with examples of combination therapy in the near future.
A More Quantitative Path to Success!
Clinical drug programs and studies can be smarter (higher probability of technical success) and faster (e.g. lower N). It's time to leave outdated and inefficient power calculations behind!